Rauschenberg v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that, \Georgia law presumes the sanity of a defendant\ and that the defense of involuntary intoxication requires an accused to \establish he did not have sufficient mental capacity to distinguish between right and wrong in relation to such act\
• recognizing that, “Georgia law presumes the sanity of a defendant” and that the defense of involuntary intoxication requires an accused to “establish he did not have sufficient mental 6 capacity to distinguish between right and wrong in relation to such act”
• defendant relying upon involuntary intoxication defense bears burden of rebutting, by a preponderance of the evidence, presumption of sanity

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).