Raulerson v. Ashcroft

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that “[i]f the FBI believes that a search of its [central records system] is sufficient, it need not go further”
• finding that, “to the extent that the FBI has sought to protect names and identifying information through Exemption 7(D), such information is already protected under Exemption 7(C)”
• rejecting an Exemption 7(D) invocation based only on “mutual understandings,” “cooperative efforts,” and the like when the FBI did not explain if the withheld documents were available to the public or provided on a condition of confidentiality

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).