Raul Arias v. Codealtex, LLC

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a potential increase in a guideline range from 21-27 months to 63-78 months did not raise due process concerns
• holding that a potential increase in a guideline range from 21-27 months to 63-78 months did not raise due process con- cerns
• rejecting argument that relevant conduct provision is not authorized by the Sentencing Reform Act
• finding that “[although [the defendant’s] term of punishment would be almost tripled following the proper application of section 1B1.1, we do not believe that the impact of this guideline section is so extreme or overwhelming as to raise due process concerns.”
• pointing out that a due process violation does not occur when a defendant receives a three-fold increase in sentence based on prior conduct
• reviewing Guidelines provisions under the Chevron 3 deference rubric

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).