Rauh v. Rockford Products Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that even if the arbitrator misinterpreted the contract provisions, the award must not be vacated unless gross errors of law or mistakes of fact exist on the face of the award
• an arbitration award will be vacated where the face of the award reflects that it was premised on a gross mistake of law or fact
• under the UAA, “an arbitrator’s award will not be set aside for errors in judgment or mistakes of law or fact”
• if an award is within the submission and contains the honest decision of the arbitrators, after a full hearing, a court will not set it aside for errors of law or fact
• an arbitration award will be vacated where the face 11 Nos. 1-06-2749 and 1-06-3484 (Consolidated) of the award reflects that it was premised on a gross mistake of law or fact
• circumstances where a court shall vacate and/or modify an award

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).