Raudebaugh v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding summary dismissal was appropriate because the petitioner did not make a sufficient showing that the failure of defense counsel to hire an independent DNA expert actually prejudiced his case
• “It is well established that applicants for post-conviction relief are not allowed to raise issues in post-conviction proceedings that could have been raised on direct appeal unless the issues were not known and could not reasonably have been known during the direct appeal.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).