Raudebaugh v. D'Haeseleer

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that this court may adopt the Board’s recommendation without further discussion if it does so for “substantially” the same reasons
• explaining that “deference to the Hearing Committee’s factual findings and credibility determinations is especially heightened where the determinations are 22 based on direct observation of the Respondent”
• noting that \deference to the Hearing Committee's factual findings and credibility determinations is especially heightened where the determinations are based on direct observation of the [r]espondent\ (internal quotation marks omitted)
• “In the District of Columbia, ‘[a] personal representative owes a fiduciary duty to the estate and its beneficiaries.’” (alteration in original) (quoting In re Estate of Hines, 715 A.2d 116, 119 (D.C. 1998))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).