Rauch v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “A statute is procedural if it provides the method for enforcing a right, but it has no impact on a claimant’s legal entitlement under the facts of a particular case.”
• “A statute is procedural if it provides the method for enforcing a right, but it has no impact on a claimant’s legal entitlement under the facts of a particular case.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Giant Eagle, Inc. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2012-03-13· cited 21×
• Smiley v. State
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 2015-03-06· cited 8×
• Miegoc v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board
  Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 2008-12-03· cited 3×
• Vaneman v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board
  Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 2007-04-04

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Kachinski v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1987-10-15· cited 488×
• Russell v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board
  Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 1988-12-02· cited 401×
• Kuca v. Lehigh Valley Coal Co.
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1920-06-26· cited 139×
• Keystone Coal Mining Corp. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board
  Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 1996-01-25· cited 22×
• Fidler v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board
  Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 1984-06-11· cited 13×
• McCormick v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board
  Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 1999-07-16· cited 6×
• RCA Corp. v. Commonwealth
  Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 1979-10-11· cited 6×
• Montgomeryville Airport, Inc. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board
  Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 1988-05-31· cited 6×