Appellate Court of Illinois· 2/8/1983
Rauch v. Rauch
Citations
- 445 N.E.2d 77
- 112 Ill. App. 3d 198
- 67 Ill. Dec. 785
- 1983 Ill. App. LEXIS 1429
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- involving will giving survivor property “to be his or her absolute property;” holding where equal treatment for family is provided, it would be “illogical” to give survivor power to disrupt dispositive scheme
- presence of all five characteristics clearly indicated that a husband and wife intended for their jointly-executed will to be a joint and mutual will
- presence of all five characteristics clearly indicated that a husband and wife intended for their jointly- executed will to be a joint and mutual will
- presence of all five characteristics clearly indicated that a husband and wife intended for their jointly executed will to be a joint and mutual will
- “A joint and mutual will must be executed pursuant to a contract between the testators, requiring the survivor of them to dispose of the property as the will’s provisions instruct”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Mills
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
23 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- In Re Estate of SchwebelAppellate Court of Illinois· 1985-05-30· cited 19×
- In re Leix EstateMichigan Court of Appeals· 2010-08-26· cited 17×
- Thomas v. First National BankAppellate Court of Illinois· 1985-05-30· cited 13×
- King v. TravisAppellate Court of Illinois· 1988-05-13· cited 13×
- In Re Estate of KaplanAppellate Court of Illinois· 1991-09-06· cited 12×
- In re Estate of ZivinAppellate Court of Illinois· 2016-02-19· cited 12×
- Elizabeth J. Bartlett, as of the Estate of Charles E. Grimes, Deceased v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueSeventh Circuit· 1991-09-10· cited 11×
- In Re Estate of KnightAppellate Court of Illinois· 1989-01-11· cited 11×
- In Re Estate of ArmijoNew Mexico Supreme Court· 2001-09-04· cited 10×
- In Re Estate of SignoreAppellate Court of Illinois· 1986-11-19· cited 9×
- Orso v. LindseyAppellate Court of Illinois· 1992-08-28· cited 8×
- Gillespie v. Estate of ArnoldAppellate Court of Illinois· 1986-03-24· cited 7×
- In Re Estate of EricksonAppellate Court of Illinois· 2006-01-12· cited 6×
- Harper v. HumphreyAppellate Court of Illinois· 1985-11-19· cited 5×
- Perino v. EldertAppellate Court of Illinois· 1992-05-22· cited 3×
- Kinkin v. MarchesiAppellate Court of Illinois· 1992-10-29· cited 3×
- Young v. YoungAppellate Court of Illinois· 1991-03-26· cited 3×
- Winter v. SheetsAppellate Court of Illinois· 1985-05-30· cited 3×
- Buettner v. RintoulAppellate Court of Illinois· 1990-02-28· cited 3×
- Perino v. EldertAppellate Court of Illinois· 1991-08-21· cited 1×
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Frazier v. PattersonIllinois Supreme Court· 1909-12-22· cited 103×
- Bonczkowski v. KucharskiIllinois Supreme Court· 1958-03-20· cited 59×
- Helms v. DarmstatterIllinois Supreme Court· 1966-03-24· cited 44×
- Peck v. DrennanIllinois Supreme Court· 1951-11-27· cited 43×
- In Re Estate of EdwardsIllinois Supreme Court· 1954-05-24· cited 29×
- Tontz v. HeathIllinois Supreme Court· 1960-09-29· cited 25×
- First United Presbyterian Church v. ChristensonIllinois Supreme Court· 1976-10-01· cited 24×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.