Skip to main content
· 2/3/1906

Rauch v. Bruckman Brewing Co.

Citations

  • 18 Ohio C.C. Dec. 546
  • 7 Ohio C.C. (n.s.) 460

Syllabus

<p>INJUNCTION — PARTY WALLS.</p> <p>Jelke, Swing and Giffen, JJ.</p> <p>1. Mandatory Injunction not Allowed to Compel Specific Structure.</p> <p>A mandatory injunction will not issue to compel tbe erection of a structure of a specific character.</p> <p>2. Plaintiff Consenting to Location and Erection of Wall may not Enjoin the Use of a Particular, Wall.</p> <p>In an action to enjoin the erection of a wall on plaintiff’s property, where the plaintiff has consented to the location and erection of the wall, the character of the structure and the manner of its erection are not proper subjects for an injunction. Equitable grounds failing, equity will not award damages.</p> <p>. [Syllabus approved by the court.]</p>

Judges: Giffen, Jelke, Swing

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.