Rattray v. Woodbury County, IA

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• detailing how class counsel adequacy requirements provide critical safeguards against due process concerns that are inherent in class actions
• granting in part and denying in part the plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment
• “The inquiry into adequacy of representation, in particular, requires the district court’s close scrutiny, because the purpose of Rule 23(a)(4) is to ensure due process for absent class members, who generally are bound by a judgment rendered in a class action.”
• “The inquiry into adequacy of representation, in particular, requires the district court’s close scrutiny, because the purpose of Rule 23(a)(4) is to ensure due process for absent class members, who generally are bound by a judgment rendered in a class action.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).