Skip to main content
· 10/26/1911

Ratterman v. Apperson

Citations

  • 145 Ky. 117
  • 140 S.W. 51
  • 1911 Ky. LEXIS 788

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • considering ripeness challenge, explained that “subject matter jurisdiction is not a decision on the merits, and is resolved as a motion to dismiss, not summary judgment”
  • affirming adaptive management planning for ORV use in the Preserve

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hobson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.