Skip to main content
· 11/13/2007

Ratliff v. Stewart

Citations

  • 508 F.3d 225
  • 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 28664
  • 2007 WL 3353624

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • filing an opposition to a summary judgment motion after it had been made clear for seven months that plaintiff had sued the wrong defendant
  • a disagreement with the plaintiff’s counsel’s legal theory is insufficient to demonstrate improper purpose under § 1927

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Reavley, Smith and Garza, Circuit Judges

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.