· 11/13/2007
Ratliff v. Stewart
Citations
- 508 F.3d 225
- 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 28664
- 2007 WL 3353624
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- filing an opposition to a summary judgment motion after it had been made clear for seven months that plaintiff had sued the wrong defendant
- a disagreement with the plaintiff’s counsel’s legal theory is insufficient to demonstrate improper purpose under § 1927
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Reavley, Smith and Garza, Circuit Judges
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.