Ratliff v. Commonwealth

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “if the 3 In 1950, a single statute simply proscribed shooting “at” vehicles and buildings. Code § 18-210 (1950
• holding that “if the legislature had intended to embrace the definition of intoxication” supported by the defendant, it would have included express language doing so

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Steven Joseph Blevins v. Commonwealth of Virginia
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 2014-08-26· cited 14×
• Robert Lee Jones v. Commonwealth of Virginia
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 2017-12-19· cited 6×
• Sestito v. DeBRULAR
  E.D. Virginia· 2009-07-10

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Branch v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 1992-07-14· cited 210×
• Hubbard v. Henrico Ltd. Partnership
  Supreme Court of Virginia· 1998-02-27· cited 117×
• Commonwealth v. Harley
  Supreme Court of Virginia· 1998-09-18· cited 86×
• Gardner v. Commonwealth
  Supreme Court of Virginia· 1954-05-03· cited 72×
• Crislip v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 2001-10-30· cited 24×
• Williams v. Matthews
  Supreme Court of Virginia· 1994-09-16· cited 19×
• Zamani v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 1997-11-18· cited 15×
• Saponaro v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 2008-01-15· cited 10×
• Wolfe v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 2004-04-13· cited 5×
• Meierotto v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 2007-06-12· cited 2×