Ratliff v. City of Gainesville

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the district court did not err in rejecting a 6 No. 14-31338 “taint” instruction not required by our precedent
• holding that the \pretext plus\ instruction requires reversal
• holding that the “pretext plus” instruction requires reversal
• parties and court relying on Reeves for analysis of court’s pretext instruction
• error not to give pretext inference instruction

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).