Skip to main content
· 5/2/1911

Ratliff v. Adkins

Citations

  • 143 Ky. 447
  • 136 S.W. 914
  • 1911 Ky. LEXIS 446

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that “since the state court had no power to adjudicate a claim against the United States for negligence at a Post Office, this court likewise has no power to adjudicate this claim against it
  • applying derivative jurisdiction doctrine and dismissing FTCA claim against employee of USPS removed pursuant to § 1442(a)(1)
  • “When a case is removed under § 1442(a)(1), the jurisdiction of the federal court is derivative of that of the state court.”
  • “Such claims against the United States are within the exclusive jurisdiction of the federal courts under the Federal Tort Claims Act”
  • dismissal does not prevent Plaintiff from bringing “a separate action against the United States in this court under the FTCA”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Clay

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.