· 5/2/1911
Ratliff v. Adkins
Citations
- 143 Ky. 447
- 136 S.W. 914
- 1911 Ky. LEXIS 446
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that “since the state court had no power to adjudicate a claim against the United States for negligence at a Post Office, this court likewise has no power to adjudicate this claim against it
- applying derivative jurisdiction doctrine and dismissing FTCA claim against employee of USPS removed pursuant to § 1442(a)(1)
- “When a case is removed under § 1442(a)(1), the jurisdiction of the federal court is derivative of that of the state court.”
- “Such claims against the United States are within the exclusive jurisdiction of the federal courts under the Federal Tort Claims Act”
- dismissal does not prevent Plaintiff from bringing “a separate action against the United States in this court under the FTCA”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Clay
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.