Rationis Enterprises Inc. Of Panama v. Hyundai Mipo Dockyard Co., Ltd.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that determinations concerning the appropriate choice of law were questions of law to be reviewed de novo
• “[T]he seventh Lauritzen factor— the law of the forum — is irrelevant here because this litigation is in the courts of the United States.”
• “[W]e have explicitly held that a COGSA claim may be a mixed tort, contract and bailment cause of action.” (internal quotation marks omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).