Skip to main content

Rathbun v. Cato Corp.

Citations

  • 93 S.W.3d 771
  • 2002 Mo. App. LEXIS 2277
  • 2002 WL 31600990

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that ambiguity exists where there is “duplicity, indistinctness, or uncertainty in the meaning of the words used”
  • “[T]he erroneous admission of evidence is ‘scarcely ever’ grounds for reversal in a court- tried case,” “except where it appears from the record that the court relied on the evidence and that no other competent evidence supports the judgment.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Phillip R. Garrison

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

28 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.