Rathbun v. Autozone, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that Congress may provide “separate administrative and judicial paths through which to rectify the same wrongs” without creating an irreconcilable conflict
• noting that the Rhode Island Supreme Court routinely analyzes RIFEPA claims under Title VII and that FEPA and RICRA claims rise and fall together
• explaining that evidence of pretext was scant where plaintiff claimed she was more qualified than male employees who received promotions more quickly than she did
• explaining that a plaintiff must show that she \was qualified for an open position for which she applied\ as a prima facie element of a failure-to-promote claim
• assuming that framework applies under the Rhode Island Civil Rights Act
• noting that pretextual evidence might include “evidence of differential treatment”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).