Skip to main content

Rath v. Rath

Citations

  • 2017 ND 80
  • 892 N.W.2d 205
  • 2017 WL 1250765
  • 2017 N.D. LEXIS 80

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[C]hallenges to subject matter jurisdiction can be raised at anytime, even for the first time at oral argument.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Vandewalle, Kapsner, McEvers, Crothers, Medd, Tufte, Sandstrom

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.