Skip to main content
· 2/28/1992

Rates v. Electric

Citations

  • 243 Va. 320
  • 8 Va. Law Rep. 2238
  • 414 S.E.2d 834
  • 1992 Va. LEXIS 22

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that “[m]edical opinions that predate the 19 alleged onset of disability are of limited relevance.”
  • holding that imposition of a sentence within the properly calculated range is not reviewable
  • recognizing that need to delay arrests even after probable cause is estab- lished
  • holding § 3742(a) precludes a criminal defendant from seeking review of court’s sentence anywhere within properly calculated sentencing range
  • explaining that the Sentencing Commission adequately considered age in formulating the sentencing guidelines
  • sentencing disparity under the Sentencing Guidelines does not vio- late the Equal Protection Clause

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hassell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.