· 2/28/1992
Rates v. Electric
Citations
- 243 Va. 320
- 8 Va. Law Rep. 2238
- 414 S.E.2d 834
- 1992 Va. LEXIS 22
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that “[m]edical opinions that predate the 19 alleged onset of disability are of limited relevance.”
- holding that imposition of a sentence within the properly calculated range is not reviewable
- recognizing that need to delay arrests even after probable cause is estab- lished
- holding § 3742(a) precludes a criminal defendant from seeking review of court’s sentence anywhere within properly calculated sentencing range
- explaining that the Sentencing Commission adequately considered age in formulating the sentencing guidelines
- sentencing disparity under the Sentencing Guidelines does not vio- late the Equal Protection Clause
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hassell
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.