Skip to main content
· 10/20/1992

Ratcliff v. Fibreboard Corp.

Citations

  • 819 F. Supp. 584
  • 1992 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21309
  • 1992 WL 471683

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that agreement was a final settlement under Chapter 33, despite language in the agreement to the contrary
  • “A settlement between a plaintiff and the non-diverse defendant is final enough to support removal, even if the non-diverse defendant has not been severed from the case.”
  • “A settlement between a plaintiff and the non-diverse defendant is final enough to support removal, even if the non-diverse defendant has not been severed from the case.” (citing Chohlis v. Cessna Aircraft Co., 760 F.2d 901, 903 n.2 (8th Cir. 1985
  • high-low agreement constituted final settlement preventing defendants from appealing verdict

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Nowlin

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.