Rasnick v. Dickenson County School Board

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that, if the court were not bound by Baynard, it would adopt the view embraced by the majority of courts that “actual notice includes knowledge indicating a substantial risk or likelihood of harm,” but that it could not “distinguish [Baynard] in any principled way”
• superintendent’s knowledge of the discrimination was insufficient to confer actual knowledge on the school board for Title IX liability

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).