Rashid v. Khulmann

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The tolling provision does not, however, ‘revive’ the limitations period (i.e., restart the clock at zero
• “Once the limitations period is expired, collateral review can no longer serve to avoid a statute of limitations.”
• “The tolling provision does not, however, ‘revive’ the limitations period (i.e., restart the clock at zero
• “The tolling provision does not, however, ‘revive’ the limitations period (i.e., restart the clock at zero
• “The tolling provision does not, however, ‘revive’ the limitations period (i.e., restart the clock at zero
• “The tolling provision does not, however, ‘revive’ the limitations period (i.e., restart the clock at zero); it can only serve to pause a clock that has not yet fully run.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).