Rasheem Matthews v. Todd Ishee

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that witness’s withdrawal of original guilty plea, plea to reduced charges, and resentencing were public information and that government could not have “disclosed” information “readily available to the defense”
• concluding that witness's withdrawal of original guilty plea, plea to reduced charges, and resentencing were public information and that government could not have \disclosed\ information \readily available to the defense\
• concluding that witness’s withdrawal of original guilty plea, plea to reduced charges, and resentencing were public information and that government could not have “disclosed” information “readily available to the defense”
• explaining that an inference that the prosecution must have made a pre-trial deal with a witness in exchange for testimony is itself insufficient basis for a Brady claim
• finding that there is \no question [defendant] procedurally defaulted his claim\ where the Court of Appeals of Ohio held that a motion for new trial was untimely and that the defendant had not exercise reasonable diligence
• assuming without deciding that an untimely-filed motion under Ohio Criminal Rule 33 would constitute a procedural default unless the petitioner could show cause for the untimeliness and prejudice from failure to reach the constitutional claim

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).