Rashad v. Walsh

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that deference is accorded to findings of both state trial and state appellate courts
• explaining that deference is accorded to findings of both state trial and state appellate courts
• finding that petitioner’s failure to cite specific case did not preclude exhaustion when petitioner’s application for further state appellate review identified speedy trial claim
• explaining that deference is accorded to findings of both state trial and state appellate courts
• suggesting that AEDPA “deference is heightened in a Barker-type case, because constructing a balance among the four factors is more judicial art than science” (quotations omitted)
• finding no speedy trial violation where “the petitioner took no action of any kind either to accelerate the proceedings in his case or to stimulate an expeditious adjudication.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).