Skip to main content

Rash v. McKinstry Co.

Citations

  • 331 Or. 665
  • 20 P.3d 197
  • 2001 Ore. LEXIS 137

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that the phrase “all rights to compensation” relates only to a claimant’s right to benefits
  • concluding that statutory context provided meaning of the statute, rejecting alternative meaning derived from the doctrine of the last antecedent
  • concluding that statutory context provided meaning of the statute, rejecting alternative meaning derived from the doctrine of the last antecedent
  • concluding that where the wording in the third sentence “casts a wider net” than the wording in the first sentence, a CDA resolves all matters contained within that wider net
  • “ [A] s that lien was not mentioned in the parties’ CDA, the lien was ‘resolved,’ or extinguished, by the CDA.”
  • plain and unambiguous meaning of the word “all” is “every”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Carson, Gillette, Durham, Kulongoski, Leeson, Riggs

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Rash v. McKinstry Co.

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.