Rash v. Givens

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• denying motion to dismiss for lack of supplemental jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1367(c) where “some federal law claims remain”
• declining to exercise supplemental jurisdiction because the court had dismissed all claims over which it had original jurisdiction

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).