Rarick v. DeFrancesco

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the Section 165.55 presumption “is not applicable . . . because there is no evidence in the record to indicate that either Defendant . . . knew of, let alone relied upon, this presumption when they decided to arrest Plaintiff”
• “A complaint need not state ‘facts,’ ‘ultimate facts,’ or even ‘facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action.’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).