Raquel Sanchez-Cruz v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a petitioner who failed to raise a due-process argument about an IJ’s bias before the BIA failed to preserve the issue
• holding that “abuse of discretion claims recast as due process violations do not constitute colorable due process claims over which we may exercise jurisdiction.”
• noting that the IJ “refused to allow the petitioner to introduce evidence that specifically contradicted some of his factual findings”
• holding that the “misapplication of relevant case law” may not be reviewed
• holding that the “misapplication of relevant case law” may not be reviewed
• holding that claims of IJ bias must be raised before the BIA

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).