Rapture Shipping, Ltd. v. Allround Fuel Trading B.V.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding courts generally extend comity when it does not prejudice rights of United States citizens or violate domestic policy
• holding courts generally extend comity when it does not prejudice rights of United States citizens or violate domestic policy
• “To simply have offered an argument that is inconsistent with the position advanced before [the court] is not enough, however, to warrant the invocation of judicial estoppel”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).