Rappa v. State University

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that a stating a plaintiff had resorted to “what can only be called terrorism” was a “nonactionable opinion”
• finding statements published in an environmental newsletter stating that plaintiff “has resorted to what can only be called terrorism by suing every member of the Town Board and Planning Board personally” was “nonactionable opinion”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).