Rapp v. Peyroux

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding summary judgment on equitable defenses unwarranted where there was a material dispute on intentional infringement
• granting defendant’s summary judgment motion on plaintiff’s CUTPA claim related to an intellectual property and unfair competition dispute, where the plaintiff was located in Connecticut, but the alleged disparaging statements by the defendant occurred in India
• “A strict reading of the statute supports the conclusion that CUTPA requires that the violative conduct complained of occur in Connecticut.”
• evidence that registrant “advertised, marketed and promoted” its marks in the United States was insufficient to find the marks were commercially strong as a matter of law
• Defendant’s Rule 36 admission conclusively established facts in summary judgment record

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).