Rapp v. Central Railroad
Citations
- 269 Pa. 266
- 112 A. 440
- 1921 Pa. LEXIS 541
Syllabus
<p>Negligence — Railroad —■ Automobile — Right-angled collision — ■ Speed of train — Proximate cause — Negative testimony as to signals —Evidence—Gase for court.</p> <p>1. It is not a negligent act to operate a railroad train at thirty miles an hour in an open country district.</p> <p>2. Where a chauffeur sees a train in front of him crossing the road when he is some 155. feet away, and operates his automobile so as to run into the train at right angles, the speed of the train has nothing to do with the accident, and is immaterial.</p> <p>3. Negative testimony of those who did not hear a signal at a railroad crossing, as against the positive affirmative testimony of witnesses who did hear, and who were in a position to know, is not enough to make out a charge of negligence against the railroad company.</p> <p>Mr. Justice Kephart dissented.</p>
Judges: Frazer, Kephart, Sadlr, Schaffer, Simpson, Walling
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
7 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Zotter v. Lehigh Talley R. R.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1924-03-10· cited 38×
- Stack v. WapnerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1976-09-27· cited 21×
- Craft v. HinesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1922-01-03· cited 20×
- Cella v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1950-01-16· cited 13×
- Moore v. United StatesE.D. Pennsylvania· 1963-03-21· cited 3×
- Costack v. Pennsylvania R. R.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1954-01-13· cited 1×
- O'Neill v. Reading Railway Co.Schuylkill County Court of Common Pleas· 1927-12-19
Cites
2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.