Skip to main content
· 6/19/2012

Rapoport v. Securities & Exchange Commission

Citations

  • 401 U.S. App. D.C. 205
  • 682 F.3d 98
  • 2012 WL 2298772
  • 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 12336

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[A]gencies must apply their rules consistently. They may not depart from their precedent without explaining why. If they do, we have no choice but to remand for a reasoned explanation.” (citation and internal quotation marks omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sentelle, Griffith, Williams

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.