· 6/19/2012
Rapoport v. Securities & Exchange Commission
Citations
- 401 U.S. App. D.C. 205
- 682 F.3d 98
- 2012 WL 2298772
- 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 12336
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “[A]gencies must apply their rules consistently. They may not depart from their precedent without explaining why. If they do, we have no choice but to remand for a reasoned explanation.” (citation and internal quotation marks omitted)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Sentelle, Griffith, Williams
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.