Rapoport v. Asia Electronics Holding Co., Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that when documents contain statements that contradict the allegations in the complaint, the documents control and the court need not accept as true the allegations contained in the complaint
• dismissing securities complaint where documents relied upon contradicted allegations in amended complaint
• “If these documents contradict the allegations of the amended complaint, the documents control and this Court need not accept as true the allegations in the amended complaint.” (citation omitted)
• where documents relied on in drafting complaint contradict complaint, “the documents control and this Court need not accept as true the allegations in the amended complaint”
• “If [the] documents contradict the allegations of the . . . complaint, the documents control and [the] court need not accept as true the allegations in the . . . complaint.”
• where a document that is integral to the complaint contradicts the allegations of a complaint, the document controls and the Court need not accept as true the allegations in the complaint

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).