Raphael Fraga v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that Rule 403 of the Federal Rules of Evidence applies to the admission of evidence under Rule 414
• holding that Rule 414 does not violate Due Process Clause because Rule 403 applies to the admission of evidence under Rule 414
• holding that Federal Rule of Evidence 414, a companion to Rule 413 addressing the admission of propensity evidence in cases of child molestation, is constitutional on its face
• holding that evidence admissible under Rule 414 is still subject to Rule 403’s balancing test
• holding that Rule 403 of the Fed- eral Rules of Evidence applies to the admission of evidence under Rule 414
• holding that testimony explaining how otherwise innocent behavior is really criminal conduct is not inherently prejudicial

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).