Skip to main content
· 1/9/2003

Rape v. M.O. Dental Lab

Citations

  • 95 S.W.3d 712
  • 2003 Tex. App. LEXIS 189
  • 2003 WL 69534

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that under similar facts a summary judgment was final for purposes of appeal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Day, Gardner, Hill

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.