Skip to main content
· 3/3/1997

Rao v. County of Fairfax VA

Citations

  • 108 F.3d 42
  • 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 3704
  • 70 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 44,746
  • 73 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 338
  • 1997 WL 86324

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that while “an unreviewed state administrative determination . . . is not entitled to any preclusive effect,” such determinations do have preclusive effect “if rendered or reviewed by a court”
  • \ 'The clear teaching of Elliott is that in a Title VII action a prior state decision enjoys ... preclusive effect only if rendered or reviewed by a court.' \ (quoting Mclnnes v. California, 943 F.2d 1088, 1093-94 (9th Cir. 1991))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hamilton, Williams, Michael

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.