· 3/3/1997
Rao v. County of Fairfax VA
Citations
- 108 F.3d 42
- 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 3704
- 70 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 44,746
- 73 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 338
- 1997 WL 86324
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that while “an unreviewed state administrative determination . . . is not entitled to any preclusive effect,” such determinations do have preclusive effect “if rendered or reviewed by a court”
- \ 'The clear teaching of Elliott is that in a Title VII action a prior state decision enjoys ... preclusive effect only if rendered or reviewed by a court.' \ (quoting Mclnnes v. California, 943 F.2d 1088, 1093-94 (9th Cir. 1991))
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hamilton, Williams, Michael
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.