Skip to main content
· 12/22/2006

Ransom v. Topaz Marketing, L.P.

Citations

  • 152 P.3d 2
  • 143 Idaho 641
  • 2006 Ida. LEXIS 160

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[T]he rule precluding recovery in excess of the diminution in value is not of invariable application.”
  • “If land is permanently injured, but not totally destroyed, the owner is entitled to the difference between the fair market value before and after the injury” not restoration costs

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Trout, Schroeder, Eismann, Burdick, Jones

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.