· 12/22/2006
Ransom v. Topaz Marketing, L.P.
Citations
- 152 P.3d 2
- 143 Idaho 641
- 2006 Ida. LEXIS 160
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “[T]he rule precluding recovery in excess of the diminution in value is not of invariable application.”
- “If land is permanently injured, but not totally destroyed, the owner is entitled to the difference between the fair market value before and after the injury” not restoration costs
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Trout, Schroeder, Eismann, Burdick, Jones
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.