Skip to main content
· 4/20/1990

Ransom v. Roberts

Citations

  • 791 P.2d 489
  • 309 Or. 654
  • 1990 Ore. LEXIS 138

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that a proposed caption focused inappropriately on the measure’s “perceived effects,” rather than on its subject
  • petitioner who did not argue in comments to Secretary of State that word “amendment” should be substituted for word “provision” could not thereafter assert such argument on judicial review
  • this court will approve a certified ballot title that complies substantially with the statutory standards even if the court does not believe it to be the best of all possible ballot titles
  • no comments on proposed title made to Secretary of State

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Van Hoomissen

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.