Ransier v. McFarland (In Re McFarland)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “[u]nder Ohio law, inadequate consideration, an intra-familia[l] transfer, and the threat of execution constitute three badges of fraud that are in themselves sufficient to find actual intent”
• considering equity value in excess of the amount of existing valid liens as an asset under Ohio law
• under Ohio UFTA, considering equity value in excess of the amount of existing valid liens as an asset
• under Ohio UFTA, considering equity value in excess of the amount of existing valid liens as an asset
• “[B]y explicitly providing for exemption in these narrow situations, Congressional intent was to deny exemptions for recovered property outside the limits of §§ 522(g), (h), and (i
• “Concealment of property for purposes of 11 U.S.C. § 727(a)(2)(A) generally involves the transfer of legal title of that property ... with the debtor retaining the benefits of ownership in the property.” (emphasis added)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).