Ranney v. Ranney

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• prenuptial agreement invalid because property division so favored husband that he \tended to gain by bringing about a separation\ because he would retain all property acquired during the marriage and the wife could not make any claim against him for support
• prenuptial agreement invalid because property division so favored husband that he “tended to gain by bringing about a separation” because he would retain all property acquired during the marriage and the wife could not malee any claim against him for support

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Gross v. Gross
  Ohio Supreme Court· 1984-06-13· cited 109×
• In Re the Marriage of Traster
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2014-12-19· cited 67×
• Newman v. Newman
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 1982-11-01· cited 54×
• Guffy Ex Rel. Reeves v. Guffy
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1981-07-17· cited 23×
• In Re the Marriage of Adams
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1986-12-05· cited 12×
• In re the Marriage of Traster
  Court of Appeals of Kansas· 2012-12-07· cited 8×
• In re Marriage of Kidane & Araya
  Court of Appeals of Kansas· 2017-01-13· cited 7×
• In Re the Estate of Gardiner
  Court of Appeals of Kansas· 2001-05-11· cited 6×
• Matter of Marriage of Moler and Moler
  Court of Appeals of Kansas· 2019-07-26

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Frontiero v. Richardson
  Supreme Court· 1973-05-14· cited 1,487×
• Fincham v. Fincham
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1946-01-26· cited 24×
• Service Oil Co., Inc. v. White
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1975-11-08· cited 22×
• Calkins v. Calkins
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1942-03-07· cited 21×
• Booth v. Booth
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1923-10-06· cited 7×
• Bremer v. Bremer
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1960-11-12· cited 5×