Ranna Muor v. U.S. Bank National Association

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding summary judgment in favor of defendant proper where plaintiff did not “explain how this purported policy violation is probative of [defendant]’s discriminatory intent.”
• 8- month gap “between the bulk of the alleged adverse actions and [the] protected activity vitiates [the] contention that the temporal link gives rise to an inference of retaliatory motive.”
• “[T]he employees used for comparison must have dealt with the same supervisor, have been subject to the same standards, and engaged in the same conduct without any mitigating or distinguishing circumstances.”
• applying the “very close” standard to Title VII retaliation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).