Skip to main content
· 10/14/2003

Rann, Robert W. v. Chao, Elaine

Citations

  • 346 F.3d 192
  • 358 U.S. App. D.C. 122
  • 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 20892
  • 84 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 41,527
  • 92 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1261
  • 2003 WL 22331896

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that “the plain language of this statute requires the filing of a notice of intent to sue with the EEOC itself”
  • holding that ADEA administrative exhaustion is subject to equitable exception but noting some inconsistency regarding whether the requirement might nevertheless be in some sense a jurisdictional prerequisite and declining to resolve the issue
  • reiterating that “the timeliness and exhaustion requirements of § 633a(d) are subject to equitable defenses and are in that sense non-jurisdictional”
  • recognizing the “powerful cautions” against applying equitable estoppel against the government
  • upholding dismissal of claimant’s age discrimination claim for his failure to submit signed affidavit to EEO investigator
  • recognizing the “powerful cautions” against applying equitable estoppel against the government

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ginsburg, Sentelle, Williams

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.