· 10/14/2003
Rann, Robert W. v. Chao, Elaine
Citations
- 346 F.3d 192
- 358 U.S. App. D.C. 122
- 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 20892
- 84 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 41,527
- 92 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1261
- 2003 WL 22331896
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that “the plain language of this statute requires the filing of a notice of intent to sue with the EEOC itself”
- holding that ADEA administrative exhaustion is subject to equitable exception but noting some inconsistency regarding whether the requirement might nevertheless be in some sense a jurisdictional prerequisite and declining to resolve the issue
- reiterating that “the timeliness and exhaustion requirements of § 633a(d) are subject to equitable defenses and are in that sense non-jurisdictional”
- recognizing the “powerful cautions” against applying equitable estoppel against the government
- upholding dismissal of claimant’s age discrimination claim for his failure to submit signed affidavit to EEO investigator
- recognizing the “powerful cautions” against applying equitable estoppel against the government
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Ginsburg, Sentelle, Williams
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.