Rankin v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that where a defendant, in a 3.850 motion, claims that his plea was involuntarily entered based on the misadvise of counsel, he .must allege that he would not have entered the plea had he been given the correct information
• confirming that Rule 3.850 governs a claim that a defendant would not have entered a plea had he been aware of the correct guidelines sentence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Peters v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-12-12· cited 5×
• Towery v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2008-03-28· cited 4×
• Tatum v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2010-01-20· cited 4×

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Strickland v. Washington
  Supreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
• Skidmore v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1997-03-05· cited 28×
• Richie v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-12-15· cited 13×
• Smith v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-08-25· cited 9×
• Kleppinger v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2000-06-16· cited 9×
• State v. Taylor
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-07-14· cited 7×
• Days v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1994-05-18· cited 6×
• Herman v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-08-10· cited 1×