Skip to main content
· 4/10/1975

Rankin v. Frebank Co.

Citations

  • 47 Cal. App. 3d 75
  • 121 Cal. Rptr. 348
  • 1975 Cal. App. LEXIS 1003

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the Court’s decision in Ross was unavailable to plaintiffs in a shareholder’s derivative suit in their attempt to secure a jury
  • finding no lost opportunity when no evidence \remotely implies that [the offeror] would have been willing to sell his note at a discount to the corporation\
  • awarding pro rata recovery where defendant misappropriated corporate assets

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Stephens

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.