Raniola v. Bratton

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that a hostile work 21 environment plaintiff may prevail by adducing “circumstantial proof that . . . 22 adverse treatment that was not explicitly sex‐based was, nevertheless, suffered 6 Cf. Scott v. Harris, 550 U.S. 372, 380 (2007
• “[P]rior derogatory comments by a co-worker may permit an inference that further abusive treatment by the same person was motivated by the same []bias manifested in the earlier comments.” (emphasis added)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).