Ranger Insurance v. BP

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding it was not clear what portion of the purchase price would fairly be considered “stolen”
• dismissing MDTPA claim for failure to present evidence of a risk of future harm
• “The adequacy of capitalization must be measured at the time of incorporation because it reveals whether the corporation was created to avoid liability.”
• buyer’s ongoing efforts to find tenants did not ratify contract as a matter of law
• “[T]he Court finds that the Damons do not have a valid [MDTPA] claim for injunctive relief because they have not presented evidence that they face any risk of future harm to themselves.”
• “[T]he Court finds that the Damons’ allegation that they were induced to part with the purchase price by fraud potentially fall [sic] within the ambit of the civil theft statute.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).