Ranger Fuel Corp. v. West Virginia Human Rights Commission

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The fact that an applicant’s handicap creates a reasonable probability of a materially enhanced risk of substantial harm to the handicapped person or others is a legitimate, nondiscriminatory reason [for an adverse employment action].”
• “The fact that an applicant’s handicap creates a reasonable probability of a materially enhanced risk of substantial harm to the handicapped person or others is a legitimate, nondiscriminatory reason [for an adverse 25 employment action].”
• “A handicapped person claiming employment discrimination under W.Va. Code, 5-11-9 [1981], must prove as a prima facie case that such a person (1) meets the definition of “handicapped,” (2) possesses the skills to do the desired job with reasonable accommodations and (3

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).