Ranger Const. Co. v. Dixie Floor Co., Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• \The defendant's responses to interrogatories indicated that the defendant was essentially a service corporation engaged in the installation and construction of flooring.\
• contract's reference to defendant as \subcontractor\ rather than materialman is one factor establishing that flooring installation contract is for construction not goods
• “The defendant’s responses to interrogatories indicated that the defendant was essentially a service corporation engaged in the installation and construction of flooring.”
• “It is interesting to note that throughout the contract the defendant, Dixie Floor Co., Inc., is not referred to as a materialman but rather as a subcontractor.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).